Teachers and their students have a special relationship; what they do affects each other. Teachers and students can’t survive without one another since there would be no teacher without any student. Based on this special relationship, a certain expectation has been developed in the classroom environment. Gradually, some spoken or unspoken rules and system have been established between these two individuals which exist till now. On the surface, the main aspect of this relationship has been founded, typically on responsibility and obligation that these individuals feel about each other, yet, in depth there are other elements into teacher and student’s relationship which work more than obligation.. Although, the nature of teacher and student responsibility is different from each other, there is an aspect that needs to be considered above any other aspect, and that is, the relationship must be meaningful for both these two individuals. But what makes a relationship meaningful between teachers and students, in a way that, teachers could love student and student could like them enough to let them teach and finally who has the greater responsibility?

To address the above questions, we could say that, the student’s main responsibility consists of, respecting the teacher , learning what is taught, and applying the material that has been taught. Moreover, students, occasionally are encouraged to be prompt, neat and polite: to work hard to succeed, respect school authority and respect other people’s property. On the other hand, obviously, the role of an educator is to teach, in a way that helps student learn the subject matter easily. I strongly believe that the educator has the great responsibility in educating students.. Students learn from a teacher who has many qualities suitable for teaching successfully . For a better understanding of successful teaching, we need to define characteristic of a good teacher and describe qualification of successful educator . The qualities of a good teacher are endless, never the less. Nevertheless, among these, we can mention few basic traits that an educator has to have, in order to be called a capable teacher. Qualities such as, kindness, self control, duty, realability, sportsmanship and truthfulness are among the many of characteristics of a good educator who wants to have a nurturing and nourishing relationship with students. For example, the kind and realiable teachers are always available for their students mentally and physically ; They spend many of their precious time after school to help a students learn a subject matter.

There were lots of insight , point of view and arguments to wheter martial law had negative or positive effects of politics, economy society and culture of the philippines. Some people may say that the martial law was the darkest episodes in the country’s very recent past and some may applauded Marcos for imposing such system that results to a more “Disciplined Filipinos” but most of who experienced martial law , considered it as one of the horrible memory of the past . Impressive at first , but on the latter part caused in pain.

Politically speaking , marcos’ dictatorship and “crony capitalism” had a great impact and contributed to a less competitive and an incompetent government. Marcos appointed his friends , families , and to people that he has an “utang na loob” even thought these are not qualified and cannot fullfil there duties well. This closed the door for those who are much competent and the one that the Filipino people which gave a hard time attainting stability. Although he has a nice visions for the future , programs for economic developement , concerning farmers , the tourist sector , and even improvement in infrastructures were not properly planned that resulted to the philippines to have debt-driven-growth.

Thousand of opposition leaders , party member , journalist and outspoken critics of the corruption of marcos’ previoused years in office were rounded up and executed or jailed. Others fled abroad and many young idealist and freedom loving youth fled to the mountains and forest . There they formed a resistance movement called “The New People’s Army ” based on communist ideology . It’s continues as a forced to this day . Many innocent young people were summarily executed . Marcos also had a war on drugs . He cracked down the on the pusher and distributers and jailed thousand of young drugs users and dependent . He executed in public television an accused Chinese drug dealer , no evidence or proof was indeed to establish his guilt. That caused worlwide sensation . The oppresion and jailing , torture and killing of critics without trial was a Brutal legacy that brought much Suffering to the filipino peoples .It is being immitated today.

Like today , on President duterte he have also a war on drug he authorized the police the if the pusher or drug are fight againts police they have also shoot to kill . There are many situation in martial law that we have today .. Martial law will be painful but the thing is WE LEARNED TO APPRICIATED AND UNDERSTAND THAT FREEDOM IS NOT ABSOLUTE

There were lots of insight , point of view and arguments to wheter martial law had negative or positive effects of politics, economy society and culture of the philippines. Some people may say that the martial law was the darkest episodes in the country’s very recent past and some may applauded Marcos for imposing such system that results to a more “Disciplined Filipinos” but most of who experienced martial law , considered it as one of the horrible memory of the past . Impressive at first , but on the latter part caused in pain.

Politically speaking , marcos’ dictatorship and “crony capitalism” had a great impact and contributed to a less competitive and an incompetent government. Marcos appointed his friends , families , and to people that he has an “utang na loob” even thought these are not qualified and cannot fullfil there duties well. This closed the door for those who are much competent and the one that the Filipino people which gave a hard time attainting stability. Although he has a nice visions for the future , programs for economic developement , concerning farmers , the tourist sector , and even improvement in infrastructures were not properly planned that resulted to the philippines to have debt-driven-growth.

Thousand of opposition leaders , party member , journalist and outspoken critics of the corruption of marcos’ previoused years in office were rounded up and executed or jailed. Others fled abroad and many young idealist and freedom loving youth fled to the mountains and forest . There they formed a resistance movement called “The New People’s Army ” based on communist ideology . It’s continues as a forced to this day . Many innocent young people were summarily executed . Marcos also had a war on drugs . He cracked down the on the pusher and distributers and jailed thousand of young drugs users and dependent . He executed in public television an accused Chinese drug dealer , no evidence or proof was indeed to establish his guilt. That caused worlwide sensation . The oppresion and jailing , torture and killing of critics without trial was a Brutal legacy that brought much Suffering to the filipino peoples .It is being immitated today.

Like today , on President duterte he have also a war on drug he authorized the police the if the pusher or drug are fight againts police they have also shoot to kill . There are many situation in martial law that we have today .. Martial law will be painful but the thing is WE LEARNED TO APPRICIATED AND UNDERSTAND THAT FREEDOM IS NOT ABSOLUTE

In 1972, the Philippines was officially declared to be under martial law by its then president, Ferdinand Marcos. The establishment of this new law turned their democratic political system into a totalitarian system, functioning similarly to the system used by “The Party” in George Orwell’s novel, 1984. Both governments’ propagandic efforts had allowed them to remain in power through the use of physical force, psychological manipulation of aphorisms, and media restraints.

Marcos had issued Proclamation 1081 to prevent a social breakdown and collapse of the economy, as well as gain control over the media (“Marcos Administration”). He instituted martial law and “justified [it] as a necessary corrective to the lawlessness permeating the nation” (Espiritu). Though the Party never justified their actions or doctrines, they still had complete control over their people. In both situations, the government had complete authority over their people as a result of their propaganda efforts. They both constantly surveilled everything to watch for any signs of disloyalty. Curfews were so heavily enforced in the Philippines that anyone caught loitering would be thrown into prison, similar to how a midnight stroll was deemed “suspicious” and even a simple facial twitch could lead to an arrest in 1984. When the Philippine nation demanded a Kalayaan, a nation with economic equality that was free from foreign domination, from their president, he punished the rebels and even put some of them to death (“The Philippines Under Ferdinand Marcos Regime”). Though the members of the Party never asked for economic equality, those who rebelled against their teachings were detained and severely disciplined. For instance, Winston Smith, the protagonist of 1984, was caught for having rebellious thoughts, which were considered a crime as they disobeyed the Party’s doctrines. Thus he was captured and put into Room 101 where he was forced to endure pain until he submitted to the beliefs of the Party. Both governments abused the power they were given. The people looked towards them

In history, we commemorate glorious days and eras that make us proud of our nation and its people. However, almost every nation in the world also remember its “days of infamy” mainly to remind us never to let those dark days happen again.

The Marcos martial law period was one of the darkest times in Philippine history. It has been said that only the Japanese occupation during the Second World War inflicted more suffering for the Filipino people. One would think that those responsible for the tragedy of the martial law would dedicate themselves to making amends as their penance and asking forgiveness for their sins. Instead we see a concerted effort to revise history – to deny the tortures and human rights violations that happened. There is even an almost comical attempt to repaint that period of our history as some kind of golden age.

I never thought that after 34 years, those who were responsible for so much suffering would be seeking to go back in power. Unbelievably, they are seeking to return to power espousing the same Marcosian ideology. The past 34 years represent an entire generation who never experienced martial law. There is a need to educate this new generation on what really happened.

In 1972, the Philippines was officially declared to be under martial law by its then president, Ferdinand Marcos. The establishment of this new law turned their democratic political system into a totalitarian system, functioning similarly to the system used by “The Party” in George Orwell’s novel, 1984. Both governments’ propagandic efforts had allowed them to remain in power through the use of physical force, psychological manipulation of aphorisms, and media restraints.

Marcos had issued Proclamation 1081 to prevent a social breakdown and collapse of the economy, as well as gain control over the media (“Marcos Administration”). He instituted martial law and “justified [it] as a necessary corrective to the lawlessness permeating the nation” (Espiritu). Though the Party never justified their actions or doctrines, they still had complete control over their people. In both situations, the government had complete authority over their people as a result of their propaganda efforts. They both constantly surveilled everything to watch for any signs of disloyalty. Curfews were so heavily enforced in the Philippines that anyone caught loitering would be thrown into prison, similar to how a midnight stroll was deemed “suspicious” and even a simple facial twitch could lead to an arrest in 1984. When the Philippine nation demanded a Kalayaan, a nation with economic equality that was free from foreign domination, from their president, he punished the rebels and even put some of them to death (“The Philippines Under Ferdinand Marcos Regime”). Though the members of the Party never asked for economic equality, those who rebelled against their teachings were detained and severely disciplined. For instance, Winston Smith, the protagonist of 1984, was caught for having rebellious thoughts, which were considered a crime as they disobeyed the Party’s doctrines. Thus he was captured and put into Room 101 where he was forced to endure pain until he submitted to the beliefs of the Party. Both governments abused the power they were given. The people looked towards them

In history, we commemorate glorious days and eras that make us proud of our nation and its people. However, almost every nation in the world also remember its “days of infamy” mainly to remind us never to let those dark days happen again.

The Marcos martial law period was one of the darkest times in Philippine history. It has been said that only the Japanese occupation during the Second World War inflicted more suffering for the Filipino people. One would think that those responsible for the tragedy of the martial law would dedicate themselves to making amends as their penance and asking forgiveness for their sins. Instead we see a concerted effort to revise history – to deny the tortures and human rights violations that happened. There is even an almost comical attempt to repaint that period of our history as some kind of golden age.

I never thought that after 34 years, those who were responsible for so much suffering would be seeking to go back in power. Unbelievably, they are seeking to return to power espousing the same Marcosian ideology. The past 34 years represent an entire generation who never experienced martial law. There is a need to educate this new generation on what really happened.

There were lots of insight , point of view and arguments to wheter martial law had negative or positive effects of politics, economy society and culture of the philippines. Some people may say that the martial law was the darkest episodes in the country’s very recent past and some may applauded Marcos for imposing such system that results to a more “Disciplined Filipinos” but most of who experienced martial law , considered it as one of the horrible memory of the past . Impressive at first , but on the latter part caused in pain.

Politically speaking , marcos’ dictatorship and “crony capitalism” had a great impact and contributed to a less competitive and an incompetent government. Marcos appointed his friends , families , and to people that he has an “utang na loob” even thought these are not qualified and cannot fullfil there duties well. This closed the door for those who are much competent and the one that the Filipino people which gave a hard time attainting stability. Although he has a nice visions for the future , programs for economic developement , concerning farmers , the tourist sector , and even improvement in infrastructures were not properly planned that resulted to the philippines to have debt-driven-growth.

Thousand of opposition leaders , party member , journalist and outspoken critics of the corruption of marcos’ previoused years in office were rounded up and executed or jailed. Others fled abroad and many young idealist and freedom loving youth fled to the mountains and forest . There they formed a resistance movement called “The New People’s Army ” based on communist ideology . It’s continues as a forced to this day . Many innocent young people were summarily executed . Marcos also had a war on drugs . He cracked down the on the pusher and distributers and jailed thousand of young drugs users and dependent . He executed in public television an accused Chinese drug dealer , no evidence or proof was indeed to establish his guilt. That caused worlwide sensation . The oppresion and jailing , torture and killing of critics without trial was a Brutal legacy that brought much Suffering to the filipino peoples .It is being immitated today.

Like today , on President duterte he have also a war on drug he authorized the police the if the pusher or drug are fight againts police they have also shoot to kill . There are many situation in martial law that we have today .. Martial law will be painful but the thing is WE LEARNED TO APPRICIATED AND UNDERSTAND THAT FREEDOM IS NOT ABSOLUTE